Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:20230908
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Other_Citation_Details:
pa611
Online_Linkage: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/
Description:
Abstract:
This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most
detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National
Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing
maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base
and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely
sensed and other information.

This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and
computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area
extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory
of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable
pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at
the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line
features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features
too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large
enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and
management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the
National Soil Information System relational database, which gives
the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.
Purpose:
SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.
Supplemental_Information:
Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other
associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be
available from the primary organization listed in the Point of
Contact.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:20050929
Ending_Date:20230908
Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Status:
Progress:Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency:As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate:-80.519
East_Bounding_Coordinate:-79.838
North_Bounding_Coordinate:40.478
South_Bounding_Coordinate:39.721
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus:None
Theme_Keyword:soil survey
Theme_Keyword:soils
Theme_Keyword:Soil Survey Geographic
Theme_Keyword:SSURGO
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS)
Place_Keyword:Pennsylvania
Place_Keyword:Greene and Washington Counties
Place_Keyword:Amity NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Amity NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Amity SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Amity SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Avella NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Avella NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Avella SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Avella SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Bethany NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Bethany SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Blacksville NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Blacksville NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Bridgeville NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Bridgeville SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Bridgeville SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Burgettstown NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Burgettstown NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Burgettstown SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Burgettstown SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:California NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:California NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:California SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:California SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Cameron NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Cameron SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Canonsburg NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Canonsburg NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Canonsburg SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Canonsburg SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Carmichaels NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Carmichaels NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Carmichaels SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Carmichaels SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Claysville NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Claysville NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Claysville SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Claysville SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Clinton NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Clinton NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Clinton SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Clinton SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Donora NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Donora SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Ellsworth NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Ellsworth NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Ellsworth SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Ellsworth SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Fayette City NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Garards Fort NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Garards Fort NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Garards Fort SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Garards Fort SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Glassport SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Glassport SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Hackett NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Hackett NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Hackett SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Hackett SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Holbrook NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Holbrook NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Holbrook SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Holbrook SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Hundred NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Hundred NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Littleton NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Majorsville NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Majorsville SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Masontown NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Masontown NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Masontown SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Masontown SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Mather NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Mather NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Mather SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Mather SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Midway NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Midway NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Midway SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Midway SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Monongahela NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Monongahela NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Monongahela SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Monongahela SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Morgantown North NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Morgantown North NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:New Freeport NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:New Freeport NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:New Freeport SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:New Freeport SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Oak Forest NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Oak Forest NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Oak Forest SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Oak Forest SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Oakdale SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Osage NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Osage NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Prosperity NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Prosperity NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Prosperity SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Prosperity SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Rogersville NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Rogersville NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Rogersville SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Rogersville SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Steubenville East NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Steubenville East SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Valley Grove NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Valley Grove SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Wadestown NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Wadestown NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Washington East NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Washington East NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Washington East SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Washington East SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Washington West NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Washington West NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Washington West SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Washington West SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Waynesburg NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Waynesburg NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Waynesburg SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Waynesburg SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Weirton NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Weirton SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:West Middletown NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:West Middletown NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:West Middletown SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:West Middletown SW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Wind Ridge NE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Wind Ridge NW Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Wind Ridge SE Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Wind Ridge SW Quadrangle
Access_Constraints:None
Use_Constraints:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products
derived from these data.

This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool
in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference
source. This is public information and may be interpreted by
organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on
needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate
application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to
reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any
authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps
for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.

Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater
than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation
of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The
depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from
them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and
detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data
and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only.
Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and
users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position:State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type:mailing address
Address:
USDA-NRCS
Address:
359 East Park Drive, Suite 2
City:Harrisburg
State_or_Province:PA
Postal_Code:17111-2747
Contact_Voice_Telephone:717-237-2207
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone:7172372235
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:717-237-2238
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:Yuri.Plowden@usda.gov
Back to Top
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
The attribute accuracy is tested by manual
comparison of the source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized
display of the map data on an interactive computer graphic system.
Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or
on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In
addition, the attributes are tested against a master set of valid
attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in
the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s).
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Certain node/geometry and topology GT- polygon/chain relationships
are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements
(the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these
requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains
must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through
nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain
element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing
the limits of the file are free of gaps. The tests of logical
consistency are performed using vendor software. All internal
polygons are tested for closure with vendor software and are checked
on hard copy plots. All data are checked for common soil lines (i.e.,
adjacent polygons with the same label). Edge locations generally do
not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch.

The Soil Survey of Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania is
edge matched to the adjacent Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) databases
of Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, Beaver and Lawrence Counties,
Pennsylvania, Marion and Monogalia Counties, West Virginia and
Wetzel County, West Virginia. The soil survey area boundaries match.
The soil survey boundary for Greene and Washington Counties also
matches the Penn State University county boundary coverage.

Washington County joins Westmoreland County along the Monogalia River.
The feature edges of Washington County match the feature edges in
Beaver County.  The feature edges of Greene County match the feature
edges in Wetzel County.  Most feature edges for Greene County match
those in Monogalia County.  The soil labels for the Greene and
Washington Soil Survey do not match the soil labels of the adjacent
surveys.
Completeness_Report:
A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named in terms of
their soil components or miscellaneous areas or both. Each map
unit differs in some respect from all others in a survey area and
each map unit has a symbol that uniquely identifies the map unit
on a soil map. Each individual area, point, or line so identified
on the map is a delineation.

Soil Scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous areas
that have properties and behavior significantly different than the
named soils in the surrounding map unit. These minor components
may be indicated as special features. If they have a minimal effect
on use and management, or could not be precisely located, they may
not be indicated on the map.

A map unit has specified kinds of soils or miscellaneous areas
(map unit components), each with a designated range in
proportionate extent. Map units include one or more kinds of soil
or miscellaneous area. Miscellaneous areas are areas that have little
or no recognizable soil.

Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures
were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map
units, and location of special soil features. These standards are
outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993,
USDA, NRCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, 1995,
USDA, NRCS; and all Amendments; Keys to Soil Taxonomy,
(current issue) USDA, NRCS; National Soil Survey
Handbook, title 430-VI,(current issue) USDA, NRCS.

The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit
delineations were based on data collected by scientists during
the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National
Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on
peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality
control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the
soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural
Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds
of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes,
associations, and undifferentiated groups.

Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil.
In a consociation, delineated areas use a single name from the
dominant component in the map unit. Dissimilar components are
minor in extent. The soil component in a consociation may be
identified at any taxonomic level. Soil series is the lowest
taxonomic level. A consociation that is named as a miscellaneous
area is dominantly that kind of area and minor components do not
significantly affect the use of the map unit. The total amount of
dissimilar inclusions of other components in a map unit generally
does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if
nonlimiting. A single component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion
generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.

Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations consist
of two or more  dissimilar components that occur in a regularly
repeating pattern. The total amount of other dissimilar components
is minor extent. The following arbitrary rule determines whether
complex or association is used in the name. The major components
of an association can be separated at the scale of mapping. In
either case, because the major components are sufficiently different
in morphology or behavior, the map unit cannot be called a
consociation. In each delineation of a complex or an association,
each major component is normally present though their proportions
may vary appreciably from one delineation to another. The total
amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of
the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and
25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting
inclusion usually does not exceed 10 percent.

Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two
or more components that are not consistently associated
geographically and, therefore, do not always occur together in
the same map delineation. These components are included in the
same named map unit because their use and management are the same
or very similar for common uses. Generally they are grouped together
because some common feature, such as steepness, stoniness, or
flooding, determines their use and management. If two or more
additional map units would serve no useful purpose, they may be
included in the same unit. Each delineation has at least one of the
major components, and some may have all of them. The same principles
regarding the proportion of minor components that apply to
consociations also apply to undifferentiated groups. The same
principles regarding proportion of inclusion apply to
undifferentiated groups as to consociations.

Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile
descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend,
one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation
transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per
3,000 acres.

A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive
purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the
kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations
and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name
map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of
about 5 acres.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The accuracy of these digital data is based upon their
compilation to base maps that meet National Map
Accuracy Standards at a scale of 1 inch equals 1,000
feet. The difference in positional accuracy between the
soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the
field and their digitized map locations is unknown. The
locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies
with the transition between map units.

For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition
occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change
abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very
narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features
generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of their locations on
the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched
between data sets. The data along each quadrangle edge are
matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge
locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline
by more than 0.01 inch.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Publication_Date:1983
Title:
Soil Survey of Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:atlas
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Washington D.C.
Publisher:U.S. Government Printing Office
Source_Scale_Denominator:15,840
Type_of_Source_Media:paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:1983
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
SCS1
Source_Contribution:
basic reference material about soils
and landscapes
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
publication annotation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Source_Scale_Denominator:15,840
Type_of_Source_Media:stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:1983
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date of soil survey
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS1
Source_Contribution:
final publication negatives used to develop
ratioed film positives
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
ratioed film positives of the publication annotation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Source_Scale_Denominator:12,000
Type_of_Source_Media:stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:1983
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date of soil survey
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS2
Source_Contribution:
reference material for soil line placement
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date:1992 - 1996
Title:
multiple digital orthophotographic quadrangles (DOQs)
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Reston, Virginia
Publisher:U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator:12,000
Type_of_Source_Media:stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:1992
Ending_Date:1996
Source_Currentness_Reference:
image source dates
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
USGS1
Source_Contribution:
base maps for compilation
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date:1953 - 1998
Title:
multiple 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Reston, Virginia
Publisher:U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator:24,000
Type_of_Source_Media:paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:1953
Ending_Date:1998
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
USGS2
Source_Contribution:
landscape shape, aspect and slope reference
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
multiple annotated compilation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Source_Scale_Denominator:12,000
Type_of_Source_Media:stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:2003
Ending_Date:2004
Source_Currentness_Reference:
dates of compilation
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS3
Source_Contribution:
stable-base compilation sheets containing
soil delineations and special feature locations
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
multiple characterization and statistical data
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Source_Scale_Denominator:12,000
Type_of_Source_Media:paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:2005
Source_Currentness_Reference:
date analyses were completed
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS4
Source_Contribution:
the attribute information for soil map unit
delineations, special feature locations,
and data on soil properties
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:2005
Title:
National Soil Information System (NASIS) database for Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Information Technology Center
Type_of_Source_Media:online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:2005
Source_Currentness_Reference:
export certification date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS5
Source_Contribution:
tabular soil property data linked to
spatial soil data
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:2005
Title:
National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media:database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:2005
Ending_Date:2005
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Source_Contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
region 6 soils geodatabase
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:file geodatabase
Type_of_Source_Media:vector digital data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:2006
Ending_Date:2018
Source_Currentness_Reference:
SSURGO publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS6
Source_Contribution:
Source of digital revision - recreated yearly
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, Aerial Photography Field Office
Publication_Date:2022
Title:
NAIP mosaics covering Washington and Greene Cos., Pennsylvania
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, Aerial Photography Field Office
Source_Scale_Denominator:24000
Type_of_Source_Media:NRCS Geospatial Data Gateway, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Services Agency
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:2022
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
FSA1
Source_Contribution:
Source of digital revision - recreated yearly
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database covering Washington and Greene Cos., Pennsylvania
Type_of_Source_Media:vector digital data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:2006
Ending_Date:2022
Source_Currentness_Reference:
SSURGO publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS7
Source_Contribution:
Source of digital revision - recreated yearly
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access (PASDA)
Publication_Date:2021
Title:
LiDAR-based DEM mosaic for Washington County, PA and Greene County, PA. \PAMAP_DEM_County_Mosaics\Washington\PAMAP_DEM_mosaic_Washington_3m.tif
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:file geodatabase
Type_of_Source_Media:vector digital data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:2016
Ending_Date:2021
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
PASDA1
Source_Contribution:
Lidar-derived hillshade used to aid in visual editing.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Greene and
Washington Counties, Pennsylvania was approved in March 1979. The
Soil Survey for Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania,
published in 1983 at a scale of 1:15,840, was considered to be an
acceptable compilation source by Pennsylvania Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) soil scientists. The source materials
needed to compile and digitize the county were ordered from the
National Cartographic and Geospatial Center (NCGC) in Fort Worth,
Texas. Ratioed film positives of the publication annotation overlays
were produced at the scale of 1:12,000. Staff at the Pennsylvania
NRCS Map Compilation and Digitizing Center in University Park, PA
began compiling the soil delineations for the soil survey in 2003.
Photographic interpretation of orthophotographs and topographic
quadrangles was used to manually compile the soil boundaries onto a
stable-base film registered to a 3.75 minute orthophotographic
quadrangle base map. The ratioed film positives of the published
soil survey were also used as a reference for soil line placement.
The Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) Office for Region 13 in
Morgantown, West Virginia reviewed the source materials and
certified the map compilation on April 1, 2004. The original
compilation materials were sent to the Michigan Digitizing Unit
(MIDU) in East Lansing, Michigan for digitizing and certification.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
SCS1, NRCS1, NRCS2, USGS1, USGS2, NRCS3
Process_Date:2004
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The soil annotated overlays were raster scanned by Midwest Graphics
in Kenosha, Wisconsin using an Intergraph Anatech Eagle 4050 scanner
at 250 dpi. The digitizing and quality review were done by the MIDU
staff. Four control points corresponding to the four corners of the
quadrangle were used for registration during data collection. The
soil line processing, raster editing, map neatline development,
labeling, edgematching and vector conversion were done in LT2000
Version 1.03.  The special soil features were digitized 'on screen'
using the LT2000 Version 1.03 software. The data were created and
maintained in the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). The soils
and special soil features were exported as Digital Line Graph (DLG)
Optional format files from LT2000 Version 1.03 using the ssurgo_area
and ssurgo_spec export command. The DLG-3 optional format files for
the soils and special soil features were imported into ARC/INFO
Version 7.2.1. The MIDU staff checked the data with a set of ARC
Macro Language (AML) programs developed by NCGC. The revised
December 2003 ARC/INFO Distribution AML programs were used to create
the soil survey area coverages. These seamless soil survey coverages
were then written out as ARC Interchange files and electronically
transferred to the Pennsylvania NRCS Map Compilation and Digitizing
Center in University Park, PA for quality review by a soil scientist.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS3
Process_Date:2005
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The staff at the Pennsylvania NRCS Map Compilation and Digitizing
Center imported the e00 files into ArcGIS Version 8.0.1.  The
boundaries of streams and water bodies were evaluated and adjusted
to match the 1992-1996 Digital Orthophotographic Quadrangles (DOQs).
The limit of the soil survey was also adjusted to match the DOQ
imagery. The adjacent soil surveys in digital format were joined,
edited and clipped out to provide a common county boundary for the
soil surveys. Statistics on map unit acreages and special soil
features were generated and checked against the correlation legend.
The seamless county coverages for the soils and the special soil
features were written out in ARC/INFO Interchange format (e00)
using the EXPORT command in ArcGIS Version 8.0.1. Quality control
was performed by the soil scientists and cartographic technicians
at the Pennsylvania NRCS Map Compilation Center. The MLRA Office in
Morgantown, West Virginia certified the digitizing on April 5, 2005.
The digital maps of the soil lines and special soil features were
sent to the MIDU for SSURGO certification and archiving.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS3, NRCS4, USGS1
Process_Date:2005
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The National Soil Information System (NASIS) database was developed
by NRCS soil scientists according to national standards. The
tabular data containing the soil attributes and interpretations for
Greene and Washington Counties were initially downloaded from the
NASIS database on May 27, 2005. Pennsylvania soil scientists at the
Map Compilation and Digitizing Center generated the statistics on
map unit acreages in the spatial data. The staff checked the map
unit symbols in the spatial data against the correlation document
and used map unit acreages from the spatial data to populate the
NASIS database.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS4, NRCS5
Process_Date:2005
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The ARC/INFO Interchange files were converted into the area, point
and arc coverages using ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1.  The MIDU staff
checked the soil survey coverages with the May 2004 SSURGO
Certification AML programs for seamless projects. These ARC/INFO
programs, developed by NCGC, identified areas within the coverages
that needed revision.  The data were edited.  The Pennsylvania NRCS
soil scientists supplied the SSURGO download from the NASIS Database.
The minor codes in the soils coverages were replaced with the map
unit key codes to link the map units in the spatial data to the
NASIS database.  Upon successful completion of the SSURGO
Evaluation, the area symbol was added to each feature in the soil
survey coverages with the att_check.aml program.  The county
coverages, the feature file and the metadata were electronically
transferred to the NRCS Staging Server to be joined with the
tabular data.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS5
Process_Date:2005
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The spatial data for Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania soil survey area was
downloaded from the Soil Data Mart on October 15, 2012.  The individual
shapefiles were appended into a geodatabase for region 6.  The data were
processed in ARCGIS 10.1 using a topology object with a 0.1 meter cluster
tolerance for the purpose of eliminating gaps and overlaps within the
region 6 soils geodatabase.  Individual soil survey area data were
exported as shapefiles from the regional geodatabase.  A datum
transformation from NAD83 to WGS84 using the NAD_1983_To_WGS_1984_1 datum
transformation method was applied to the data.  The data were checked with
the SSURGO Evaluation scripts provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service. The shapefiles were then uploaded
to the soil data warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS6
Process_Date:2013
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The spatial data for the entire SSURGO database was recertified in October
of 2019 to reduce storage requirements and to improve map display
and geoprocessing performance.  The SSURGO data is internally managed
using 12 Regional Transactional Spatial Databases (RTSD) that are in
an ESRI File Geodatabase format.  The spatial extent of the RTSDs follow the
Soil and Plant Science Division (SPSD) regional administrative boundaries.
The XY coordinate system of this RTSD is USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area
Conic USGS Version WKID: 102039 and has an XY storage precision of 0.001
meters.  The RTSDs were recreated using a reduced storage precision of 0.1
meters to reduce the physical size of the data.  The SSURGO data was also
generalized by removing excess vertices, using a tolerance of 1 meter.
The topology was validated at the CONUS level using a tolerance of 0.2
meters.  This effort directly affects the gSSURGO and gNATSGO product since
these deliverables are in a File Geodatabase format.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS6
Process_Date:2019
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20190917
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20190917
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20200605
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20200605
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20210901
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20210901
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20220907
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20220907
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
In 2022-23 the Marietta Ohio MLRA Soil Survey Office completed a spatial edit project to improve the delineation of
water polygon boundaries. Review of all water polygons in Greene-Washington Counties, PA611, showed many water polygons to be off-image, drawn where there is
no longer water, or water that was not delineated. Water polygon boundaries were adjusted to the most recent NAIP imagery and un-delineated
water that was greater than the 1.5 acre minimum for Order 2 polygons was added. Adjacent delineations may have been edited, but reflect
the landforms as originally mapped. Where water no longer exists, the polygon was merged, and adjacent polygons absorbed the area according
to landforms mapped. No field work was undertaken to complete this spatial edit project. Slope gradient and hillshade maps were created from
the resampled BE DEM using Spatial Analyst in ESRI ArcGIS ArcPro 2.9.7. These elevation derivatives, along with USDA NAIP aerial photographic imagery
were used to delineate boundaries of water map units in ArcGIS Pro 2.9.7. Water delineation lines of both the edited polygons and adjacent polygons were
adjusted to match the references listed above at the intended display scale of 1:12,000. Project polygon lines ending at a county boundary were matched node to node.
Line and point special features were reviewed and adjustments, additions or deletions were made where warranted.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
4, PASDA1, FSA1, NRCS7
Process_Date:20230825
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20230908
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20230908
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20240905
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20240905
Back to Top
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method:Vector
Back to Top
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Geographic:
Latitude_Resolution:0.000001
Longitude_Resolution:0.0000001
Geographic_Coordinate_Units:decimal degrees
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name:World Geodetic System 1984
Ellipsoid_Name:World Geodetic System 1984
Semi-major_Axis:6378137.00000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio:298.257222
Back to Top
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label:Special Soil Features
Entity_Type_Definition:
Special Soil Features represent soil, miscellaneous area, or landform features that are too small to be digitized as soil delineations (area features).
Entity_Type_Definition_Source:
Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label:Special Soil Features Codes
Attribute_Definition:
Special Soil Features labels represent specific Special Soil
Features. These features are identified with a descriptive
label. The label is assigned to the point or line assigned
to represent the feature on maps.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS;
National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647
(current issue), USDA, NRCS.
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania
Codeset_Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Map Unit Delineations are closed polygons that may be dominated
by a single soil or miscellaneous area component plus allowable
similar or dissimilar soils, or they can be geographic mixtures
of groups of soils or soils and miscellaneous areas.

The map unit symbol uniquely identifies each closed map unit
delineation. Each symbol corresponds to a map unit name. The
map unit key is used to link to information in the National
Soil Information System tables.

Map Unit Delineations are described by the National Soil
Information System database. This attribute database gives the
proportionate extent of the component soils and the properties for
each soil. The database contains both estimated and measured data
on the physical and chemical soil properties and soil
interpretations for engineering, water management, recreation,
agronomic, woodland, range, and wildlife uses of the soil.

The National Soil Information System database contains static
metadata. It documents the data structure and includes such
information as what tables, columns, indexes, and relationships
are defined as well as a variety of attributes of each of these
database objects. Attributes include table and column
descriptions and detailed domain information.

The National Soil Information System database also contains a
distribution metadata. It records the criteria used for selecting
map units and components for inclusion in the set of distributed
data.

Special features are described in the feature table.  It includes an
area symbol, feature label, feature name, and feature description for
each special and ad hoc feature in the survey area.
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and
interpreting soil surveys. Agricultural Handbook 436, 1999, USDA, SCS.

Keys to Soil Taxonomy (current issue), USDA, SCS.

National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647 (current
issue), USDA, NRCS.

Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.
Back to Top
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Geospatial Center of Excellence
Contact_Address:
Address_Type:mailing and physical address
Address:
501 West Felix Street, Building 23
City:Fort Worth
State_or_Province:Texas
Postal_Code:76115
Contact_Voice_Telephone:800 672 5559
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone:202 720 2600
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:817 509 3469
Resource_Description:Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania SSURGO
Distribution_Liability:
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer
system at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, no warranty expressed
or implied is made by the Agency regarding the utility of the data
on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute
any such warranty. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will warrant
the delivery of this product in computer readable format, and will
offer appropriate adjustment of credit when the product is determined
unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input peripherals, or
when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. Request
for adjustment of credit must be made within 90 days from the date
of this shipment from the ordering site.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor any of its agencies are
liable for misuse of the data, for damage, for transmission of
viruses, or for computer contamination through the distribution of
these data sets. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits
discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,
color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political
beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name:ESRI shapefile
Format_Information_Content:
spatial
Transfer_Size:83.7
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: URL:http://DataGateway.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions:
Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Fees: There is currently no direct charge for requesting data or for retrieval via FTP.
Ordering_Instructions:
Visit the above mentioned Internet Web Site, select state or
territory, then select individual soil survey area of interest.
Spatial line data and locations of special feature symbols are in
ESRI ArcGIS shapefile, format. The National Soil Information
System attribute soil data are available in variable length, pipe
delimited, ASCII file format.
Turnaround:Typically within four hours
Back to Top
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date:20240924
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position:State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type:mailing address
Address:
USDA-NRCS
Address:
359 East Park Drive, Suite 2
City:Harrisburg
State_or_Province:PA
Postal_Code:17111-2747
Contact_Voice_Telephone:717-237-2207
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone:7172372235
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:717-237-2238
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:Yuri.Plowden@usda.gov
Metadata_Standard_Name:Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version:FGDC-STD-001-1998
Back to Top