Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Fayette County, Pennsylvania


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:20240904
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Fayette County, Pennsylvania
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Other_Citation_Details:
pa051
Online_Linkage: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/
Description:
Abstract:
This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most
detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National
Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing
maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base
and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely
sensed and other information.

This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and
computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area
extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory
of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable
pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at
the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line
features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features
too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large
enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and
management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the
National Soil Information System relational database, which gives
the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.
Purpose:
SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.
Supplemental_Information:
Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other
associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be
available from the primary organization listed in the Point of
Contact.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:20060717
Ending_Date:20240904
Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Status:
Progress:Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency:As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate:-80.011
East_Bounding_Coordinate:-79.293
North_Bounding_Coordinate:40.144
South_Bounding_Coordinate:39.721
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus:None
Theme_Keyword:soil survey
Theme_Keyword:soils
Theme_Keyword:Soil Survey Geographic
Theme_Keyword:SSURGO
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS)
Place_Keyword:Pennsylvania
Place_Keyword:Fayette County
Place_Keyword:Brandonville Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Brownfield Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Bruceton Mills Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:California Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Carmichaels Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Confluence Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Connellsville Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Dawson Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Donegal Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Donora Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Fayette City Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Fort Necessity Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Friendsville Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Kingwood Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Lake Lynn Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Mammoth Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Masontown Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Mather Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Mill Run Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Monongahela Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Morgantown North Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Mount Pleasant Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:New Salem Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Ohiopyle Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Seven Springs Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Smithfield Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Smithton Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:South Connellsville Quadrangle
Place_Keyword:Uniontown Quadrangle
Access_Constraints:None
Use_Constraints:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products
derived from these data.

This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool
in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference
source. This is public information and may be interpreted by
organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on
needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate
application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to
reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any
authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps
for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.

Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater
than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation
of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The
depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from
them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and
detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data
and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only.
Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and
users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position:State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type:mailing address
Address:
USDA-NRCS
Address:
359 East Park Drive, Suite 2
City:Harrisburg
State_or_Province:PA
Postal_Code:17111-2747
Contact_Voice_Telephone:717-237-2207
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone:7172372235
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:717-237-2238
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:Yuri.Plowden@usda.gov
Back to Top
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
The attribute accuracy is tested by manual
comparison of the source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized
display of the map data on an interactive computer graphic system.
Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or
on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In
addition, the attributes are tested against a master set of valid
attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in
the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s).
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Certain node/geometry and topology GT- polygon/chain relationships
are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements
(the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these
requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains
must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through
nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain
element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing
the limits of the file are free of gaps. The tests of logical
consistency are performed using vendor software. All internal
polygons are tested for closure with vendor software and are checked
on hard copy plots. All data are checked for common soil lines (i.e.,
adjacent polygons with the same label). Edge locations generally do
not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch.

The Soil Survey of Fayette County, Pennsylvania is edge matched to
the adjacent SSURGO (Soil SURvey GeOgraphic) certified Pennsylvania
Soil Surveys of Greene and Washington Counties, Westmoreland County
and Somerset County and the Soil Survey of Marion and Monongalia
Counties, West Virginia.

The Soil Survey of Fayette County is joined to the Soil Survey of
Greene and Washington Counties along the Monongalia River. Some of
the join between the Fayette County Soil Survey and the Somerset
County Soil Survey is the Youghiogheny River. Some of the join
between the Fayette County Soil Survey and the Westmoreland County
Soil Survey is Jacob's Creek.

All of the feature edges for this soil survey match the feature edges
in the Westmoreland County and Somerset County Soil Surveys. Most of
the feature edges for this soil survey match the feature edges in the
Soil Survey of Marion and Monongalia Counties, West Virginia. Most of
the labels for this soil survey match the labels in the Westmoreland
County Soil Survey. Some of the labels for this soil survey match the
labels in the Somerset County Soil Survey. The labels for this soil
survey do not match the labels in the Soil Survey of Marion and
Monongalia Counties, West Virginia.

The soil survey area boundary for Fayette County matches the soil
survey area boundaries of the adjacent certified soil surveys.
Completeness_Report:
A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named in terms of
their soil components or miscellaneous areas or both. Each map
unit differs in some respect from all others in a survey area and
each map unit has a symbol that uniquely identifies the map unit
on a soil map. Each individual area, point, or line so identified
on the map is a delineation.

Soil Scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous areas
that have properties and behavior significantly different than the
named soils in the surrounding map unit. These minor components
may be indicated as special features. If they have a minimal effect
on use and management, or could not be precisely located, they may
not be indicated on the map.

A map unit has specified kinds of soils or miscellaneous areas
(map unit components), each with a designated range in
proportionate extent. Map units include one or more kinds of soil
or miscellaneous area. Miscellaneous areas are areas that have little
or no recognizable soil.

Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures
were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map
units, and location of special soil features. These standards are
outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993,
USDA, NRCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, 1995,
USDA, NRCS; and all Amendments; Keys to Soil Taxonomy,
(current issue) USDA, NRCS; National Soil Survey
Handbook, title 430-VI,(current issue) USDA, NRCS.

The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit
delineations were based on data collected by scientists during
the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National
Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on
peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality
control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the
soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural
Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds
of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes,
associations, and undifferentiated groups.

Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil.
In a consociation, delineated areas use a single name from the
dominant component in the map unit. Dissimilar components are
minor in extent. The soil component in a consociation may be
identified at any taxonomic level. Soil series is the lowest
taxonomic level. A consociation that is named as a miscellaneous
area is dominantly that kind of area and minor components do not
significantly affect the use of the map unit. The total amount of
dissimilar inclusions of other components in a map unit generally
does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if
nonlimiting. A single component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion
generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.

Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations consist
of two or more  dissimilar components that occur in a regularly
repeating pattern. The total amount of other dissimilar components
is minor extent. The following arbitrary rule determines whether
complex or association is used in the name. The major components
of an association can be separated at the scale of mapping. In
either case, because the major components are sufficiently different
in morphology or behavior, the map unit cannot be called a
consociation. In each delineation of a complex or an association,
each major component is normally present though their proportions
may vary appreciably from one delineation to another. The total
amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of
the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and
25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting
inclusion usually does not exceed 10 percent.

Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two
or more components that are not consistently associated
geographically and, therefore, do not always occur together in
the same map delineation. These components are included in the
same named map unit because their use and management are the same
or very similar for common uses. Generally they are grouped together
because some common feature, such as steepness, stoniness, or
flooding, determines their use and management. If two or more
additional map units would serve no useful purpose, they may be
included in the same unit. Each delineation has at least one of the
major components, and some may have all of them. The same principles
regarding the proportion of minor components that apply to
consociations also apply to undifferentiated groups. The same
principles regarding proportion of inclusion apply to
undifferentiated groups as to consociations.

Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile
descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend,
one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation
transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per
3,000 acres.

A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive
purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the
kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations
and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name
map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of
about 5 acres.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The accuracy of these digital data is based upon their
compilation to base maps that meet National Map
Accuracy Standards at a scale of 1 inch equals 1,000
feet. The difference in positional accuracy between the
soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the
field and their digitized map locations is unknown. The
locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies
with the transition between map units.

For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition
occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change
abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very
narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features
generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of their locations on
the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched
between data sets. The data along each quadrangle edge are
matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge
locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline
by more than 0.01 inch.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Publication_Date:1973
Title:
Soil Survey for Fayette County, Pennsylvania
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:atlas
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Washington, D.C.
Publisher:U.S. Government Printing Office
Source_Scale_Denominator:15840
Type_of_Source_Media:paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:1973
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
SCS1
Source_Contribution:
basic reference material about soils
and landscapes
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
publication annotation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Source_Scale_Denominator:15840
Type_of_Source_Media:stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:1973
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date of the soil survey
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS1
Source_Contribution:
final publication negatives used to develop
ratioed film positives
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
ratioed film positives of the publication annotation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Source_Scale_Denominator:24000
Type_of_Source_Media:stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:1973
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date of the soil survey
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS2
Source_Contribution:
reference material for line placement
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date:1954-1999
Title:
multiple 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Reston, Virginia
Publisher:U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator:24000
Type_of_Source_Media:paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:1954
Ending_Date:1999
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
USGS1
Source_Contribution:
landscape shape, aspect, and slope reference
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date:1993-1995
Title:
multiple digital orthophotographic quadrangles (DOQs) in 1/3 quadrangle format
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:remotely sensed image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Reston, Virginia
Publisher:U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator:24000
Type_of_Source_Media:stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:1993
Ending_Date:1995
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
USGS2
Source_Contribution:
base maps for compilation
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
multiple annotated compilation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Source_Scale_Denominator:24000
Type_of_Source_Media:stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:2001
Ending_Date:2006
Source_Currentness_Reference:
dates of soil survey update
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS3
Source_Contribution:
stable-base compilation sheets containing
soil delineations and special feature locations
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
multiple characterization and statistical data
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:map
Source_Scale_Denominator:24000
Type_of_Source_Media:paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:2006
Source_Currentness_Reference:
download date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS4
Source_Contribution:
the attribute information for soil map unit
delineations, special feature locations,
and data on soil properties
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
Soil Survey of Fayette County, Pennsylvania
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:atlas
Source_Scale_Denominator:24000
Type_of_Source_Media:paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:2006
Source_Currentness_Reference:
final correlation of soil survey update
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS5
Source_Contribution:
basic reference material about soils and
landscapes
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:2006
Title:
National Soil Information System (NASIS) database for Fayette County, Pennsylvania
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Information Technology Center
Type_of_Source_Media:online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:2006
Source_Currentness_Reference:
export certification date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS6
Source_Contribution:
tabular soil property data linked to
spatial soil data
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:2006
Title:
National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media:database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:2006
Ending_Date:2006
Source_Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Source_Contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date:unpublished material
Title:
region 6 soils geodatabase
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:file geodatabase
Type_of_Source_Media:vector digital data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date:2006
Ending_Date:2018
Source_Currentness_Reference:
SSURGO publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS7
Source_Contribution:
Source of digital revision - recreated yearly
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Soil Survey for Fayette County, Pennsylvania was published in
1973. Field work for the published survey took place in the years
of 1947 to 1968. Since that time there has been a dramatic increase
in urbanization within the county and a soil survey update was
needed to reflect these changes. A detailed evaluation found that
significant changes in classification, land use, outdated soil
series, and standards and procedures for making soil surveys made
the 1973 survey obsolete. The approval for the soil survey update
was given in 1995.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
SCS1, USGS2
Process_Date:1995
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Ratioed film positives of the publication annotation overlays were
produced at the scale of 1:24,000 and were used as a reference for
soil line placement. Field work for the soil survey update started
in 1996 with the Initial Field Review shortly after that. Field
data was collected in the form of transects to determine mapunit
composition, pedon sampling to determine soil physical and chemical
characteristics, and locating the old type locations and
reclassifying them with new standards. Geographic reports on the
type of geology underlying the county assisted the soil scientists
with additional clues to soil/landform relationships. The field work
provided soil scientists with clues to patterns of soil occurrence
that could be remotely determined by using aerial photography, and
topographic quadrangles showing landform contours. These patterns
were then checked in the field. The final soil boundary placement
was compiled by the field soil scientist on a stable-base sheet that
registered with a stable-base 1/3 quadrangle orthophotograph. Soil
scientists then analyzed soil samples in the laboratory, and ran
statistical methods to classify and develop series and mapping units.
The Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Fayette County,
Pennsylvania was prepared at the Final Field Review during the week
of August 8, 2005. Quality assurance for the compilation was
completed by Soil Data Quality Specialists from the Major Land
Resources (MLRA) Region 13 Office in Morgantown, West Virginia
throughout the entire duration of the project. The MLRA Region 13
Office Leader certified the map compilation on March 8, 2006.
The annotated compilation overlays were sent to Midwest Graphics
Services Inc. in Kenosha, Wisconsin for scanning.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
USGS1, USGS2, NRCS1, NRCS2, NRCS3, NRCS4
Process_Date:2006
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The annotated compilation overlays were raster scanned using a drum
scanner at a resolution of 250 dpi. Four control points corresponding
to the four corners of the quadrangle were used for registration
during data collection. Soil scientists and cartographic technicians
at the Pennsylvania NRCS Map Compilation and Digitizing Center used
the LT4X software for soil data development, which included raster
editing, map neatline development, vector conversion, labeling, edge
matching and vector editing. No special soil features were digitized
for this county. The cleaned vector files were imported into the
ArcGIS Version 8.0.1 software for final plotting, edit checks, and
error analysis. The quadrangle coverages were then joined together
into a seamless county coverage. Polygon attributes were checked
against the correlation legend. The boundaries of streams and water
bodies were evaluated and adjusted to match the 1993-1995 Digital
Orthophotographic Quadrangles (DOQs). The limit of the soil survey
was adjusted to match the DOQ imagery. The adjacent soil surveys in
digital format were joined, edited and clipped out to provide a
common county boundary among the soil surveys. The data were created
and maintained in North American Datum 1983. Statistics on map unit
acreages were generated and checked with the correlation legend
and tabular data. The soil scientists and cartographic technicians
at the Pennsylvania NRCS Map Compilation Center did a 100 percent
quality review of the digitized product. The MLRA Region 13 Office
Team Leader in Morgantown, West Virginia certified the digitizing
on March 8, 2006. The seamless county coverage for the soils was
written out in ARC/INFO Interchange format (e00) and posted on the
Pennsylvania NRCS Map Compilation and Digitizing Center website.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS3, NRCS4, USGS2
Process_Date:2006
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The National Soil Information System (NASIS) database was developed
by NRCS soil scientists according to national standards. The
Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Fayette County,
Pennsylvania was published by the MLRA Region 13 Office in February
2006. The legend for the updated soil survey is a subset of the
MLRA 126/127 legend. Soil scientists at the Map Compilation and
Digitizing Center generated the statistics on map unit acreages in
the spatial data. The staff checked the map unit symbols in the
spatial data against the correlation document and used map unit
acreages from the spatial data to populate the NASIS database.
The Michigan Digitizing Unit (MIDU) staff downloaded the tabular
data containing the soil attributes and interpretations for
Fayette County from the NASIS database on March 27, 2006.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS4, NRCS5, NRCS6
Process_Date:2006
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The MIDU staff downloaded the soil survey coverage from the
Pennsylvania website and checked the soil survey coverage with a set
of ARC Macro Language (AML) programs developed by NCGC. The AML
programs created a quadrangle coverage and a soil survey area for
Fayette County. The soil survey coverages were processed using the
January 2006 SSURGO Certification AML programs for seamless projects.
These ARC/INFO programs identified areas within the coverages that
needed revision. The data were edited. The Pennsylvania NRCS soil
scientists supplied the SSURGO download from NASIS. The minor codes
in the soils coverages were replaced with the map unit key codes to
link the map units in the spatial data to the NASIS database. Upon
successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the area symbol was
added to each feature in the soil survey coverages with the
att_check.aml program. The county coverages and the metadata were
electronically transferred to the NRCS Staging Server to be joined
with the tabular data.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS6
Process_Date:2006
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The spatial data for Fayette County, Pennsylvania soil survey area was
downloaded from the Soil Data Mart on October 15, 2012.  The individual
shapefiles were appended into a geodatabase for region 6.  The data were
processed in ARCGIS 10.1 using a topology object with a 0.1 meter cluster
tolerance for the purpose of eliminating gaps and overlaps within the
region 6 soils geodatabase.  Individual soil survey area data were
exported as shapefiles from the regional geodatabase.  A datum
transformation from NAD83 to WGS84 using the NAD_1983_To_WGS_1984_1 datum
transformation method was applied to the data.  The data were checked with
the SSURGO Evaluation scripts provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service. The shapefiles were then uploaded
to the soil data warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS7
Process_Date:2013
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The spatial data for the entire SSURGO database was recertified in October
of 2019 to reduce storage requirements and to improve map display
and geoprocessing performance.  The SSURGO data is internally managed
using 12 Regional Transactional Spatial Databases (RTSD) that are in
an ESRI File Geodatabase format.  The spatial extent of the RTSDs follow the
Soil and Plant Science Division (SPSD) regional administrative boundaries.
The XY coordinate system of this RTSD is USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area
Conic USGS Version WKID: 102039 and has an XY storage precision of 0.001
meters.  The RTSDs were recreated using a reduced storage precision of 0.1
meters to reduce the physical size of the data.  The SSURGO data was also
generalized by removing excess vertices, using a tolerance of 1 meter.
The topology was validated at the CONUS level using a tolerance of 0.2
meters.  This effort directly affects the gSSURGO and gNATSGO product since
these deliverables are in a File Geodatabase format.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NRCS7
Process_Date:2019
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20190917
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20190917
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20200605
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20200605
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20210831
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20210831
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20220906
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20220906
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20230904
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20230904
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20240904
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
NASIS
Process_Date:20240904
Back to Top
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method:Vector
Back to Top
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Geographic:
Latitude_Resolution:0.000001
Longitude_Resolution:0.0000001
Geographic_Coordinate_Units:decimal degrees
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name:World Geodetic System 1984
Ellipsoid_Name:World Geodetic System 1984
Semi-major_Axis:6378137.00000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio:298.257222
Back to Top
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label:Special Soil Features
Entity_Type_Definition:
Special Soil Features represent soil, miscellaneous area, or landform features that are too small to be digitized as soil delineations (area features).
Entity_Type_Definition_Source:
Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label:Special Soil Features Codes
Attribute_Definition:
Special Soil Features labels represent specific Special Soil
Features. These features are identified with a descriptive
label. The label is assigned to the point or line assigned
to represent the feature on maps.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS;
National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647
(current issue), USDA, NRCS.
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Fayette County, Pennsylvania
Codeset_Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Map Unit Delineations are closed polygons that may be dominated
by a single soil or miscellaneous area component plus allowable
similar or dissimilar soils, or they can be geographic mixtures
of groups of soils or soils and miscellaneous areas.

The map unit symbol uniquely identifies each closed map unit
delineation. Each symbol corresponds to a map unit name. The
map unit key is used to link to information in the National
Soil Information System tables.

Map Unit Delineations are described by the National Soil
Information System database. This attribute database gives the
proportionate extent of the component soils and the properties for
each soil. The database contains both estimated and measured data
on the physical and chemical soil properties and soil
interpretations for engineering, water management, recreation,
agronomic, woodland, range, and wildlife uses of the soil.

The National Soil Information System database contains static
metadata. It documents the data structure and includes such
information as what tables, columns, indexes, and relationships
are defined as well as a variety of attributes of each of these
database objects. Attributes include table and column
descriptions and detailed domain information.

The National Soil Information System database also contains a
distribution metadata. It records the criteria used for selecting
map units and components for inclusion in the set of distributed
data.

Special features are described in the feature table.  It includes an
area symbol, feature label, feature name, and feature description for
each special and ad hoc feature in the survey area.
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and
interpreting soil surveys. Agricultural Handbook 436, 1999, USDA, SCS.

Keys to Soil Taxonomy (current issue), USDA, SCS.

National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647 (current
issue), USDA, NRCS.

Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.
Back to Top
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Geospatial Center of Excellence
Contact_Address:
Address_Type:mailing and physical address
Address:
501 West Felix Street, Building 23
City:Fort Worth
State_or_Province:Texas
Postal_Code:76115
Contact_Voice_Telephone:800 672 5559
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone:202 720 2600
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:817 509 3469
Resource_Description:Fayette County, Pennsylvania SSURGO
Distribution_Liability:
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer
system at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, no warranty expressed
or implied is made by the Agency regarding the utility of the data
on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute
any such warranty. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will warrant
the delivery of this product in computer readable format, and will
offer appropriate adjustment of credit when the product is determined
unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input peripherals, or
when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. Request
for adjustment of credit must be made within 90 days from the date
of this shipment from the ordering site.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor any of its agencies are
liable for misuse of the data, for damage, for transmission of
viruses, or for computer contamination through the distribution of
these data sets. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits
discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,
color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political
beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name:ESRI shapefile
Format_Information_Content:
spatial
Transfer_Size:23.0
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: URL:http://DataGateway.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions:
Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Fees: There is currently no direct charge for requesting data or for retrieval via FTP.
Ordering_Instructions:
Visit the above mentioned Internet Web Site, select state or
territory, then select individual soil survey area of interest.
Spatial line data and locations of special feature symbols are in
ESRI ArcGIS shapefile, format. The National Soil Information
System attribute soil data are available in variable length, pipe
delimited, ASCII file format.
Turnaround:Typically within four hours
Back to Top
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date:20240924
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position:State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type:mailing address
Address:
USDA-NRCS
Address:
359 East Park Drive, Suite 2
City:Harrisburg
State_or_Province:PA
Postal_Code:17111-2747
Contact_Voice_Telephone:717-237-2207
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone:7172372235
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:717-237-2238
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:Yuri.Plowden@usda.gov
Metadata_Standard_Name:Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version:FGDC-STD-001-1998
Back to Top